Suffixing Preferences as a Consequence of Probabilistic Reasoning Yoshihiko Asao
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Inferring User Preferences by Probabilistic Logical Reasoning over Social Networks
We propose a framework for inferring the latent attitudes or preferences of users by performing probabilistic first-order logical reasoning over the social network graph. Our method answers questions about Twitter users like Does this user like sushi? or Is this user a New York Knicks fan? by building a probabilistic model that reasons over user attributes (the user’s location or gender) and th...
متن کاملPoverty as a cause and consequence of Ill health
Background and aims: Poverty is a multidimensional phenomenon that can be defined in both economic and social terms. The paper attempts to review the existing evidence to understand the relation between poverty and ill health in the context of the limited conceptual and operational definitions of these terms. The paper uses two of Hills criteria- reversibility and dose response relationship to ...
متن کاملNormative Reasoning and Consequence
In this chapter we first provide a general introduction to the research area methodology and relevance, then we discuss normative reasoning for multi-agent systems, and finally we discuss current research challenges. We cover the main issues in modern deontic logic, which is much broader than the traditional modal logic framework of deontic logic, with an emphasis to our intended audience. To e...
متن کاملModelling Default and Likelihood Reasoning as Probabilistic
This paper presents a probabilistic analysis of plausible reasoning about defaults and about likelihood. "Likely" and "by default" are in fact treated as duals in the same sense as _possibility" and "necessity". To model these four forms probabilistically, a logic QDP and its quantitative counterpart DP are derived that allow qualitative and corresponding quantitative reasoning. Consistency and...
متن کاملSignificance testing as perverse probabilistic reasoning
Truth claims in the medical literature rely heavily on statistical significance testing. Unfortunately, most physicians misunderstand the underlying probabilistic logic of significance tests and consequently often misinterpret their results. This near-universal misunderstanding is highlighted by means of a simple quiz which we administered to 246 physicians at two major academic hospitals, on w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: LSA Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts
سال: 2013
ISSN: 2377-3367
DOI: 10.3765/exabs.v0i0.778